Chapman v. Alvis

Ohio Supreme Court

Chapman v. Alvis

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 17, 1959·No. No. 35965·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner and of the offenses with which he was charged and to which he pleaded guilty. Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The trial court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner and of the offenses with which he was charged and to which he pleaded guilty. Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Chapman v. Alvis, 169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359 (Ohio 1959).

Pincite

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359 (Chapman v. Alvis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.