Chapman v. Alvis

Ohio Supreme Court

Chapman v. Alvis

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 17, 1959

DocketNo. 35965

StatusPublished

This text of 169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359 (Chapman v. Alvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chapman v. Alvis, 169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359 (Ohio 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner and of the offenses with which he was charged and to which he pleaded guilty. Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The trial court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner and of the offenses with which he was charged and to which he pleaded guilty. Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-alvis-ohio-1959.