Chapline's Lessee v. Keedy

General Court of Virginia

Chapline's Lessee v. Keedy

3 Md. 578

DecidedMay 15, 1797

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Md. 578 (Chapline's Lessee v. Keedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chapline's Lessee v. Keedy, 3 Md. 578 (Va. Super. Ct. 1797).

Pincite

Opinion

The Cpurt

were of opinion that Such evidence should not be received, to prove that the witness was interested in the location of The Resurvey on Hills, Dales and Vineyard, without having the land in. which the plaintiff al« [579]*579leged the witness was interested located on the plots in this cause, and refused to let the witness be sworn aceordingly.

^ A juror was withdrawn by consent, for the purpose of amending the plots, and the cause was continued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Cpurt

were of opinion that Such evidence should not be received, to prove that the witness was interested in the location of The Resurvey on Hills, Dales and Vineyard, without having the land in. which the plaintiff al« [579]*579leged the witness was interested located on the plots in this cause, and refused to let the witness be sworn aceordingly.

^ A juror was withdrawn by consent, for the purpose of amending the plots, and the cause was continued.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Md. 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaplines-lessee-v-keedy-vagensess-1797.