Chaplin v. Selznick
60 N.E.2d 389, 294 N.Y. 662, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 857
This text of 60 N.E.2d 389 (Chaplin v. Selznick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chaplin v. Selznick, 60 N.E.2d 389, 294 N.Y. 662, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 857 (N.Y. 1945).
Opinion
Motion by defendant-appellant Vanguard Films, Inc., for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. [See 293 N. Y. 529.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Chaplin v. Selznick
58 N.E.2d 719 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
60 N.E.2d 389, 294 N.Y. 662, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaplin-v-selznick-ny-1945.