Chaplin v. Chaplin

49 P.2d 296, 9 Cal. App. 2d 182, 1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1280
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedSeptember 16, 1935
DocketCiv. 1712
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 P.2d 296 (Chaplin v. Chaplin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chaplin v. Chaplin, 49 P.2d 296, 9 Cal. App. 2d 182, 1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1280 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

JENNINGS, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Charles Spencer Chaplin, from the judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County in a proceeding instituted jointly by the defendant and by plaintiff, Lillita Louise Chaplin, the former wife of said defendant. The object of the proceeding was to secure judicial interpretation of a certain property settlement agreement theretofore executed by *183 the above-named parties and incorporated in the final decree rendered in the divorce action between the parties.

It is now made to appear that, during the pendency of this appeal, the parties have reached an agreement with respect to the meaning and interpretation of the above-mentioned property settlement agreement and have expressly agreed that the judgment of the trial court shall be modified in the following particulars: First, finding No. 1, as the same is set forth in the judgment, is stricken therefrom and in lieu thereof the following finding is incorporated:

“1. That the said Property Settlement Agreement by its terms permits the said Charles Spencer Chaplin, the Trustor, in the creation and establishment of said trust and trust fund, to provide by his Declaration of Trust for the reservation of the right in him, during his lifetime, to determine and direct the investment of the said trust fund and to require the Trustee to make investments of said fund as the said Trustor shall determine and direct.”

Second, finding No. 3, as set forth in the judgment, is stricken therefrom and in its place the following finding is substituted:

“3. That the Declaration of Trust attached hereto and made a part of this order, judgment and decree setting forth the terms, conditions and provisions for the creation and establishment of the trust and trust fund contemplated and provided for by said Property Settlement Agreement, and the investment, management, administration thereof and the disposition and distribution of the income and corpus thereof, is to all intents and purposes in accordance with the terms, conditions and provisions of the said property settlement agreement with respect thereto; and the execution of the said Declaration of Trust by the said Charles Spencer Chaplin and the creation of the said trust and trust fund in accordance with its terms, conditions and provisions, will constitute a full compliance with the terms, conditions and provisions of said agreement, providing for and with respect to the creation and establishment of said trust and trust fund of $200,000.00; and the deposit with the said Trustee or the retention by said Trustee of the said sum of $200,000.00 under the terms, conditions and provisions of said Declaration of Trust, to be held and administered upon the uses and trusts therein specified, *184 shall and will constitute a full release and discharge of the said Charles Spencer Chaplin of and from all and every obligation and duty to create and/or establish the trust or trust fund to be created by him pursuant to the terms, and provisions of the Property Settlement Agreement between said parties.”

Third, subdivisions (d) and (e) of the judgment are stricken therefrom. Fourth, subdivision (f) of the judgment is stricken therefrom and in its place the following subdivision designated (d) is substituted:

“(d). That upon the execution and delivery of said Declaration of Trust by said Charles Spencer Chaplin as aforesaid, and the acceptance thereof by said Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank, said bank having on deposit at said time the said sum of $200,000.00 theretofore deposited with it by the said Charles Spencer Chaplin, or the said sum of $200,000.00 deposited with said bank at the time of the acceptance of said Declaration of Trust by said bank, as the trust fund subject to the said Declaration of Trust, and the approval of the terms and conditions of said Declaration of Trust by said Lillita Louise Chaplin, as being in conformity with the said Property Settlement Agreement, the said Charles Spencer Chaplin shall be, and he hereby is, fully discharged of any and all obligation under said Property Settlement Agreement, or otherwise, to create the trust or trust fund for the benefit of the said minor children as provided in said Property Settlement Agreement, or to comply further with any term, condition or provision of said Property Settlement Agreement with respect to the creation of such trust or trust fund. ’'

Fifth, the form of Declaration of Trust attached to and made a part of the judgment is stricken therefrom and in its stead the following form of Declaration of Trust is substituted :

“DECLARATION OF TRUST.'
“KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the CITIZENS NATIONAL TRUST & SAYINGS BANK OF LOS ANGELES, a national banking association, with its principal office at Los Angeles, California, hereinafter called TRUSTEE, does hereby admit, certify and declare that CHARLES SPENCER CHAPLIN,, a resident of Beverly Hills, California, hereinafter called TRUSTOR, has conveyed, *185 transferred and delivered to the said Trustee, the sum of TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($200,000.00) lawful money of the United States.

“It is agreed that no consideration was given by the said Trustee for the delivery to it of said sum of money, and that the same has been so received and accepted by it, and will be hereafter held by it in trust, under the terms and conditions set forth in this Declaration, for the following uses and purposes, and subject to the conditions and reservations and upon the trusts following, to-wit:

“ARTICLE I.
“It is an express condition of this trust that the Trustee shall not be responsible nor assume any liability for the nature, value or extent of its title to any sum of money accepted in trust hereunder, nor for any adverse or conflicting claims of interest therein of other persons, but that its only liability shall be for such right, title and interest as it may have received or may hereafter acquire in said sums or future sums of money that may be delivered to it hereunder, and for such sums as it may collect from the corpus of the trust estate.
“ARTICLE II.
“Said Trustee is authorized and empowered to retain and hold, subject to the provisions hereof, said sum of money as well as any additional sums which may be by the Trustor or otherwise, from time to time, added to the principal of this trust, as hereinafter provided, at the risk of the trust estate and not at the risk of the Trustee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Cornejo CA2/5
California Court of Appeal, 2014
Sandler v. Casale
125 Cal. App. 3d 707 (California Court of Appeal, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 P.2d 296, 9 Cal. App. 2d 182, 1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaplin-v-chaplin-calctapp-1935.