Chapin v. White

102 Mass. 139
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 102 Mass. 139 (Chapin v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapin v. White, 102 Mass. 139 (Mass. 1869).

Opinion

Colt, J.

The first count in the plaintiff’s declaration charges • the defendant with having accused the plaintiff of the crime of perjury, in the presence and hearing of divers citizens of the [140]*140Commonwealth. The answer denies the charge as set forth in this count.

The only proof of publication offered was, that the accusation was made in the presence of the plaintiff and a citizen of Connecticut. It was objected that this was not competent to prove the publication alleged. The court are of opinion that, under the pleadings, the objection is well taken.

The fact of the publication of the words by the defendant must be alleged and substantially proved. If alleged generally, the fact may be proved by any person who heard them. But if the pleader adds any allegation which narrows and limits that which is essential, it becomes descriptive, and must be proved as allegéd. It identifies the slander. 1 Greenl. Ev. § 56. The plaintiff failed to prove the publication of the slander as alleged in his first count, and it is unnecessary to consider the instructions given, so far as they have reference to it.

In the second count, the alleged publication is not so limited. The defendant justifies the slander charged in it. And under the instructions given, to which no valid objection can be made, so far as they relate to this count, the jury have found for the defendant. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cyrus W. Scott Mfg. Co. v. Millis
67 S.W.2d 885 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Burkhiser v. Lyons
167 S.W. 244 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Kimball ex rel. Pro Ami v. Page
96 Me. 487 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1902)
Loibl v. Breidenbach
47 N.W. 15 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1890)
Perry v. Porter
124 Mass. 338 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1878)
Downs v. Hawley
112 Mass. 237 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 Mass. 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapin-v-white-mass-1869.