Chapin v. Chippewa Circuit Judge

289 N.W. 249, 291 Mich. 550, 1939 Mich. LEXIS 828
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 20, 1939
DocketCalendar 40,304
StatusPublished

This text of 289 N.W. 249 (Chapin v. Chippewa Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapin v. Chippewa Circuit Judge, 289 N.W. 249, 291 Mich. 550, 1939 Mich. LEXIS 828 (Mich. 1939).

Opinion

Wiest, J.

Within 20 days after a decree dismissing plaintiff’s bill of complaint became final, plaintiff, of right, filed a claim of appeal and a motion to extend the time for settling a case for review, noticing the hearing thereof for a day beyond the 20-day period.

Upon hearing the motion the circuit judge denied extension of time, holding want of jurisdiction in the *551 absence of an extension asked for and granted within the 20-day period.

Plaintiff seeks our direction to the circuit judge to extend the time or have our extension.

It appears that a copy of the transcript of testimony and proposed case on appeal had been served.

The circuit judge had jurisdiction to grant an extension and, under the circumstances, should have exercised the power. Andres v. Washtenaw Circuit Judge, 287 Mich. 412.

The circuit judge is directed to settle the bill of exceptions.

No costs.

Butzel, 0. J., and Bushnell, Sharpe, Potter, Chandler, North, and McAllister, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andres v. Washtenaw Circuit Judge
283 N.W. 630 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 N.W. 249, 291 Mich. 550, 1939 Mich. LEXIS 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapin-v-chippewa-circuit-judge-mich-1939.