Chapin v. Chapin

274 S.W.3d 546, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1698, 2008 WL 5501321
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 16, 2008·No. ED 90731·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randy Chapin (“Father”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court that denied his motion for sanctions against Linda Chapin (“Mother”), denied his motion to dismiss or make more definite Mother’s motion for contempt, denied his second amended motion to modify the amended judgment of dissolution, granted in part Mother’s motion for contempt, and the trial court’s independent judgment of contempt.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapin v. Chapin, 274 S.W.3d 546, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1698, 2008 WL 5501321 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

274 S.W.3d 546 (Chapin v. Chapin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rentschler v. State
274 S.W.3d 546 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)