Chapey v. Khan
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wr rt rr rr ts et rer ere EX FREDRICK J. CHAPEY, JR., : > Index No. 25 Civ. 2266 Petitioner, : - against - : PROPOSED JUDGMENT MUHAMMED SOHAIL KHAN, : Respondent. — : tak tat ae nt kkk tnt IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Petition to Confirm Final Arbitration Award (the “Petition”) is GRANTED. 2, The Final Award issued on October 16, 2024 by arbitrator Jack P. Levin, attached as an exhibit to the Declaration of David Slarskey in Support of the Petition (“the Final Award”), which incorporates by reference Interim Award I and Interim Award II, is CONFIRMED in all respects and incorporated herein by reference. 3. Judgment is entered in favor of Petitioner Fredrick J. Chapey, Jr. and against Respondent Muhammed Sohail Khan in accordance with the Final Award.
On the basis of the parties’ consent to confirmation of the arbitral award, and on the very limited review that is appropriate, see New York Hotel & Gaming Trades Council, AFL- CIO v. CSC Hudson, No. 24 Civ, 5025, 2025 WL 80228, at *4 (S.D.N.Y, Jan. 13, 2025), the Court hereby GRANTS the unobjected-to petition to confirm the arbitral award. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at Dockets 3 and 12 and to close this case. SO ORDERED. ys . Jy f f f “ n i . . PAUL A. ENGELMAVER United States District Judge Date: April 9, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chapey v. Khan (Chapey v. Khan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.