Chapel Hills Realty LLC v. Otis Elevator Company

CourtDistrict Court, D. Colorado
DecidedMarch 26, 2021
Docket1:21-cv-00565
StatusUnknown

This text of Chapel Hills Realty LLC v. Otis Elevator Company (Chapel Hills Realty LLC v. Otis Elevator Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapel Hills Realty LLC v. Otis Elevator Company, (D. Colo. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 21-cv-00565-PAB CHAPEL HILLS REALTY LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, CHAPEL HILLS CH LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, CHAPEL HILLS NASSIM LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation authorized to do business in Colorado, Defendant. SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE This matter is before the Court on defendant’s response, Docket No. 13, to the Court’s Order to Show Cause [Docket No. 11]. Defendant asserts that the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Docket No. 13 at 2. Defendant filed its notice of removal on February 25, 2021. See Docket No. 1. On March 3, 2021, the Court ordered defendant to show cause why the case should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Docket No. 11 at 4. The Court noted that defendant’s allegations were insufficient to determine whether the Court has

jurisdiction over the case because defendant failed to sufficiently allege the citizenship of the plaintiff limited liability corporations (“LLCs”). Id. at 2-3. Defendant filed its response to the Court’s order to show cause on March 11, 2021. See Docket No. 13. In its response, defendant properly identifies the various members of the plaintiff LLCs. See id. at 2-3. For most of those members, defendant also identifies the member’s citizenship. See id. at 2, ¶ 3 (stating that the members of Chapel Hills CH, LLC are two New York citizens). However, the allegations as to Chapel Hills Realty, LLC are deficient. Defendant asserts that Chapel Hills Realty, LLC is a Colorado LLC “whose sole member is Namco Realty LLC” Id., ¶ 2. Defendant

further alleges that Namco Realty LLC is a New York LLC “whose sole member is Namco Realty Ltd,” and Namco Realty Ltd. “is a privately held corporation and citizen of the British Virgin Islands.” Id. A corporation, however, “shall be deemed to be a citizen of every State and foreign state by which it has been incorporated and of the State or foreign state where it has its principal place of business.” See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). A corporation incorporated in a foreign country may still have its principal place of business in the United States. See Burge v. Sunrise Medical (US) LLC, No. 13-cv- 02215-PAB-MEH, 2013 WL 6467994, at *2 (D. Colo. Dec. 9, 2013) (citing Nike, Inc. v. Comercial Iberica de Exclusivas Deportivas, S.A., 20 F.3d 987, 990 (9th Cir. 1994)). Accordingly, defendant’s allegations as to Chapel Hills Realty, LLC are insufficient to

establish the Court’s jurisdiction. Defendant will be given one more opportunity to establish that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the case. It is therefore ORDERED that, on or before April 2, 2021, defendant shall show cause why this case should not be remanded due to the Court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. DATED March 26, 2021. BY THE COURT:

PHILIP A. BRIMMER Chief United States District Judge 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chapel Hills Realty LLC v. Otis Elevator Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapel-hills-realty-llc-v-otis-elevator-company-cod-2021.