Chapa, Abel

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 19, 2009
DocketWR-72,287-01
StatusPublished

This text of Chapa, Abel (Chapa, Abel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chapa, Abel, (Tex. 2009).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-72,287-01
EX PARTE ABEL CHAPA, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 4149 IN THE 216TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM GILLESPIE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to five years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that he received jail credit for the following dates: from December 6, 2002 to May 21, 2003, and from September 19, 2007 to January 17, 2008. He contends, however, that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) has not credited him with such time. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.

The trial court shall order TDCJ's Office of the General Counsel to file an affidavit stating whether TDCJ has credited Applicant with such time and, if not, why it has not done so. The affidavit shall also state whether Applicant submitted his claim to the time credit resolution system of TDCJ and, if so, the date his claim was submitted.

The trial court may also order depositions, interrogatories or a hearing. In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Tex. C ode Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact first as to whether Applicant has properly exhausted his administrative remedies as required by Tex. Gov't Code § 501.0081(b)-(c). The trial court shall then make findings as to whether Applicant is receiving the proper amount of time credit for his sentence. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 19, 2009

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chapa, Abel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapa-abel-texcrimapp-2009.