Chao v. First National Lending Corp.

249 F. App'x 441
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 3, 2007
Docket06-3779
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 249 F. App'x 441 (Chao v. First National Lending Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chao v. First National Lending Corp., 249 F. App'x 441 (6th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendants-appellants First National Lending Corporation and Lisa M. Scher-zer (collectively, “FNL”) appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee Elaine L. Chao, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor. FNL contends that the district court erred in concluding that (1) FNL’s loan officers were “employees” under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. (“FLSA ”), (2) FNL’s loan officers were not exempt from the minimum wage provisions of the FLSA as “outside salesmen,” and (3) FNL failed to meet its burden of proof to refute the Secretary of Labor’s back wage computations.

Having reviewed the parties’ briefs and the applicable law and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that a panel opinion further addressing the issues *442 raised would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Therefore, on the grounds identified by the district court, we affirm the district court’s judgment in favor of the Secretary of Labor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 F. App'x 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chao-v-first-national-lending-corp-ca6-2007.