Chanticleer Press, Inc. v. United States

21 Cust. Ct. 227, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 728
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedOctober 27, 1948
DocketNo. 52643; protests 126917-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 21 Cust. Ct. 227 (Chanticleer Press, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chanticleer Press, Inc. v. United States, 21 Cust. Ct. 227, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 728 (cusc 1948).

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The uncontradicted evidence establishing that the electrotype plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. v. United States (20 Cust. Ct. 78, C. D. 1088), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. v. United States
20 Cust. Ct. 78 (U.S. Customs Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Cust. Ct. 227, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chanticleer-press-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1948.