Channell v. State

106 So. 52, 21 Ala. App. 61
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 26, 1925·No. 6 Div. 672.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

In his charge to the jury, the court stated that the prosecution originated in the county court and came to the circuit court by appeal. To this exception was taken. In cases of this character the jurisdiction of the circuit court is acquitted by virtue of the statute, and therefore the court was not in error in so charging the jury. Hall’s Case, 19 Ala. App. 178, 95 So. 904.

The foregoing is the only insistence of error appearing in brief, but, as required by statute, we have read the record and find no error of a prejudicial nature.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Channell v. State, 106 So. 52, 21 Ala. App. 61 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

106 So. 52 (Channell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patton v. State
98 So. 2d 621 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1957)
Ex Parte Channell
106 So. 52 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)