Channel Master Corporation v. Video Television, Inc.

209 F.2d 511
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 30, 1953
Docket22815
StatusPublished

This text of 209 F.2d 511 (Channel Master Corporation v. Video Television, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Channel Master Corporation v. Video Television, Inc., 209 F.2d 511 (2d Cir. 1953).

Opinion

209 F.2d 511

CHANNEL MASTER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIDEO TELEVISION, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 75.

Docket 22815.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued December 17, 1953.

Decided December 30, 1953.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York; Robert A. Inch, Judge.

Action for patent infringement by plaintiff, as assignee of Patent No. 2,465,331 for a television receiving antenna issued on March 22, 1949, to J. Y. Resnick. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant finding the patent invalid for want of invention.

Armand E. Lackenbach, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

No appearance for defendant-appellee.

Before CLARK, FRANK, and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of District Judge Inch, 117 F.Supp. 812.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Channel Master Corp. v. Video Television, Inc.
209 F.2d 511 (Second Circuit, 1953)
Channel Master Corp. v. Video Television, Inc.
117 F. Supp. 812 (E.D. New York, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 F.2d 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/channel-master-corporation-v-video-television-inc-ca2-1953.