Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Chanler v. Roberts

Chanler v. Roberts

275 A.D.2d 625, 713 N.Y.S.2d 681, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9277
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 21, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 275 A.D.2d 625 (Chanler v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chanler v. Roberts, 275 A.D.2d 625, 713 N.Y.S.2d 681, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9277 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry Cozier, J.), entered June 30, 1999, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs’ action to recover real estate commissions on a theory of unjust enrichment, not having been commenced within six years of the accrual of the claims, is time-barred (see, CPLR 213 [1]; compare, e.g., Whalen v Gerzof, 76 NY2d 914). Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Lerner, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Malmsteen v. BERDON, LLP
477 F. Supp. 2d 655 (S.D. New York, 2007)
Helfand v. Sessler
194 Misc. 2d 38 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 625, 713 N.Y.S.2d 681, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chanler-v-roberts-nyappdiv-2000.