Chanler v. Roberts
275 A.D.2d 625, 713 N.Y.S.2d 681, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9277
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 21, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry Cozier, J.), entered June 30, 1999, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs’ action to recover real estate commissions on a theory of unjust enrichment, not having been commenced within six years of the accrual of the claims, is time-barred (see, CPLR 213 [1]; compare, e.g., Whalen v Gerzof, 76 NY2d 914). Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Lerner, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chanler v. Roberts, 275 A.D.2d 625, 713 N.Y.S.2d 681, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9277 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).
275 A.D.2d 625 (Chanler v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Malmsteen v. BERDON, LLP
477 F. Supp. 2d 655 (S.D. New York, 2007)
Helfand v. Sessler
194 Misc. 2d 38 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2002)