Chanin v. Chanin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chanin v. Chanin

50 A.D.2d 541, 375 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12272

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 541 (Chanin v. Chanin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chanin v. Chanin, 50 A.D.2d 541, 375 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 30, 1975, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and the case disposed of otherwise as hereinafter set forth. We find indications of violent conduct on the part of defendant-appellant husband, not entirely refuted, which arguably renders it necessary that the family apartment, claimed to be solely owned by the husband, be surrendered to the wife pending trial. (Cf. Lerner v Lerner, 21 AD2d 861; also, see Domestic Relations Law, § 234.). Nor is the husband’s sole, ownership completely unquestioned. Further, there may well be psychiatric overtones in the claimed conduct of the wife. These emergent circumstances point to the necessity of speedy trial. To that end, we direct immediate transfer of the case to Trial Term, New York County, to be set down for trial within 30 days of service of a copy of the order entered hereon. Trial has been too long delayed. Should plaintiff not be ready for trial as indicated, defendant will be privileged to seek relief anew. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Capozzoli and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 30, 1975, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and the case disposed of otherwise as hereinafter set forth. We find indications of violent conduct on the part of defendant-appellant husband, not entirely refuted, which arguably renders it necessary that the family apartment, claimed to be solely owned by the husband, be surrendered to the wife pending trial. (Cf. Lerner v Lerner, 21 AD2d 861; also, see Domestic Relations Law, § 234.). Nor is the husband’s sole, ownership completely unquestioned. Further, there may well be psychiatric overtones in the claimed conduct of the wife. These emergent circumstances point to the necessity of speedy trial. To that end, we direct immediate transfer of the case to Trial Term, New York County, to be set down for trial within 30 days of service of a copy of the order entered hereon. Trial has been too long delayed. Should plaintiff not be ready for trial as indicated, defendant will be privileged to seek relief anew. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Capozzoli and Lynch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 541, 375 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chanin-v-chanin-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack