Chang v. Chang

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chang v. Chang

73 A.D.2d 945, 423 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9857

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 73 A.D.2d 945 (Chang v. Chang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chang v. Chang, 73 A.D.2d 945, 423 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 28, 1979, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, (1) granted plaintiff a divorce based on cruel and inhuman treatment, (2) awarded plaintiff custody of the parties’ two children and ordered the defendant to pay plaintiff $40 per week for the support of each child, and (3) awarded plaintiff a counsel fee of $1,500. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The record amply supports Special Term’s findings. The issue was solely one of credibility and Special Term was in the best position to determine that issue. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Gibbons and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 28, 1979, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, (1) granted plaintiff a divorce based on cruel and inhuman treatment, (2) awarded plaintiff custody of the parties’ two children and ordered the defendant to pay plaintiff $40 per week for the support of each child, and (3) awarded plaintiff a counsel fee of $1,500. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The record amply supports Special Term’s findings. The issue was solely one of credibility and Special Term was in the best position to determine that issue. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Gibbons and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 A.D.2d 945, 423 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chang-v-chang-nyappdiv-1980.