Chang Hua Zeng v. Coosaw Partners LLC
This text of 667 F. App'x 35 (Chang Hua Zeng v. Coosaw Partners LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Chang Hua Zeng appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint after concluding that res judicata precluded [36]*36Chang’s claims. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Chang’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Chang has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid tjie decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 F. App'x 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chang-hua-zeng-v-coosaw-partners-llc-ca4-2016.