Chang Hua Zeng v. Coosaw Partners LLC

667 F. App'x 35
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 23, 2016
DocketNo. 16-1320
StatusPublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 35 (Chang Hua Zeng v. Coosaw Partners LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chang Hua Zeng v. Coosaw Partners LLC, 667 F. App'x 35 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chang Hua Zeng appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint after concluding that res judicata precluded [36]*36Chang’s claims. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Chang’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Chang has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid tjie decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chang-hua-zeng-v-coosaw-partners-llc-ca4-2016.