Chang Hua Zeng v. Coosaw Partners LLC

Fourth Circuit

Chang Hua Zeng v. Coosaw Partners LLC

667 F. App'x 35

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2016·No. No. 16-1320·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chang Hua Zeng appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint after concluding that res judicata precluded [36] Chang’s claims. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Chang’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Chang has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid tjie decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chang Hua Zeng appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint after concluding that res judicata precluded [36] Chang’s claims. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Chang’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Chang has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid tjie decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Chang Hua Zeng v. Coosaw Partners LLC, 667 F. App'x 35 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 35 (Chang Hua Zeng v. Coosaw Partners LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.