Chaney Wayne Allen v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 14, 2025
DocketA25A1033
StatusPublished

This text of Chaney Wayne Allen v. State (Chaney Wayne Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chaney Wayne Allen v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ February 14, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A1033. CHANEY WAYNE ALLEN v. THE STATE.

Chaney Wayne Allen was convicted of four counts of child molestation and two counts of sexual battery against a child under the age of sixteen. We affirmed Allen’s convictions in an unpublished opinion. See Allen v. State, Case No. A19A2023 (decided Feb. 21, 2020). Allen was initially sentenced to 40 years to serve 35 in prison and the remaining years on probation. In July 2024, the State filed a motion to correct void sentence, which the trial court granted following a hearing. Allen’s total sentence remained unchanged, but the years he was ordered to serve on probation were redistributed among the four child molestation counts to comply with OCGA § 17-10- 6.2. Allen filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’s resentencing order. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a defendant may seek sentence modification within one year from the date a sentence is imposed. But here, Allen has not sought modification of the trial court’s resentencing order. Rather, in his notice of appeal, Allen argues that he made an oral motion to merge the sentences on his convictions, which the trial court denied. The trial court’s written order does not reference Allen’s merger claim, and the record does not include the transcript from the hearing. To the extent Allen asserted such a claim, however, the claim is a challenge to his convictions, not his sentences. See Williams v. State, 287 Ga. 192, 193-194 (695 SE2d 244) (2010). “[A] petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case[,]” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009), and any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be dismissed, see id. at 218 (2); see also Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Roberts, 286 Ga. at 532.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/14/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. State
686 S.E.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Williams v. State
695 S.E.2d 244 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)
Roberts v. State
690 S.E.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chaney Wayne Allen v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaney-wayne-allen-v-state-gactapp-2025.