Chaney v. State
This text of 112 S.W.2d 464 (Chaney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The conviction is for unlawfully driving an automobile upon the public highway while intoxicated ; penalty assessed at a fine of fifty dollars.
The verdict of the jury prohibits the appellant from driving a motor vehicle upon the highways of Texas for a period of twelve months. Such verdict was authorized by Art. 802a of the Penal Code. However, that article was repealed by Chapter 466, Acts of 44th Legislature, 2nd Called Session, 1935. Under the terms of Chapter 466, supra, which was in force at the time of the appellant’s conviction, he could only be prohibited from driving a motor vehicle on the highways of Texas for a period of six months for the first offense. In the absence of the evidence adduced upon the trial, this court must assume that the present instance is the first conviction of the appellant of the offense in question.
By reason of the repeal of Art. 802a, supra, by the Act of the Legislature mentioned, that part of the verdict of the jury depriving the appellant of the right to drive a motor vehicle upon the highways of Texas for a period of twelve months was unauthorized. See Harris v. State, 109 S. W. (2d) 201; Harris v. State, 109 S. W. (2d) 203; Reeves v. State, No. 19,190, not yet reported. (Page 248 of this volume).
The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 S.W.2d 464, 133 Tex. Crim. 517, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaney-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.