Chaney v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Chaney v. State

71 S.W.2d 874, 126 Tex. Crim. 326, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 669

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chaney v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 Tex. Crim. 59 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 23, 1934·No. No. 16810.·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge. —

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of one year.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

Th judgment is affirmed.

' Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined bj*- the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge. —

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of one year.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

Th judgment is affirmed.

' Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined bj*- the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Chaney v. State, 71 S.W.2d 874, 126 Tex. Crim. 326, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 669 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

71 S.W.2d 874 (Chaney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.