Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Chaney v. State

Chaney v. State

180 S.E. 611, 180 Ga. 710, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 535
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 13, 1935
DocketNo. 10607
StatusPublished

This text of 180 S.E. 611 (Chaney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chaney v. State, 180 S.E. 611, 180 Ga. 710, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 535 (Ga. 1935).

Opinion

Beck, Presiding Justice.

R. A. Chaney and Travis Ervin were tried for the offense of murder, and a verdict was returned finding both of the defendants guilty. The motion for a new trial contains only the general grounds. Upon an examination of the evidence it appears that [711]*711there was sufficient evidence to authorize the conviction of the defendants.

No. 10607. June 13, 1935. Hamilton Burch, for plaintiffs in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, George R. Lilly, solicitor-general, B. D. Murphy and J. T. Goree, assistant atiorneys-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 S.E. 611, 180 Ga. 710, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaney-v-state-ga-1935.