Chaney v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Chaney v. State

180 S.E. 611, 180 Ga. 710, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 535

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 13, 1935·No. No. 10607·Published

Opinion

Beck, Presiding Justice.

R. A. Chaney and Travis Ervin were tried for the offense of murder, and a verdict was returned finding both of the defendants guilty. The motion for a new trial contains only the general grounds. Upon an examination of the evidence it appears that [711]*711there was sufficient evidence to authorize the conviction of the defendants.

No. 10607. June 13, 1935. Hamilton Burch, for plaintiffs in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, George R. Lilly, solicitor-general, B. D. Murphy and J. T. Goree, assistant atiorneys-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, Presiding Justice.

R. A. Chaney and Travis Ervin were tried for the offense of murder, and a verdict was returned finding both of the defendants guilty. The motion for a new trial contains only the general grounds. Upon an examination of the evidence it appears that [711]*711there was sufficient evidence to authorize the conviction of the defendants.

No. 10607. June 13, 1935. Hamilton Burch, for plaintiffs in error. M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, George R. Lilly, solicitor-general, B. D. Murphy and J. T. Goree, assistant atiorneys-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Chaney v. State, 180 S.E. 611, 180 Ga. 710, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 535 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

180 S.E. 611 (Chaney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.