Chaney v. O'Brien

Fourth Circuit

Chaney v. O'Brien

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 18, 2007

Docket07-6687

StatusUnpublished

This text of Chaney v. O'Brien (Chaney v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chaney v. O'Brien, (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6687

CARLTON L. CHANEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary Lee County,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:07-cv-00121-jlk)

Submitted: September 13, 2007 Decided: September 18, 2007

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlton L. Chaney, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Carlton L. Chaney, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Chaney v. O’Brien, No. 7:07-cv-00121-jlk (W.D.

Va. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI