Chaney v. O'Brien

Fourth Circuit

Chaney v. O'Brien

241 F. App'x 977

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 18, 2007·No. No. 07-6687·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carlton L. Chaney, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chaney v. O’Brien, No. 7:07-cv-00121-jlk, 2007 WL 1189641 (W.D.Va. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Carlton L. Chaney, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chaney v. O’Brien, No. 7:07-cv-00121-jlk, 2007 WL 1189641 (W.D.Va. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Chaney v. O'Brien, 241 F. App'x 977 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

241 F. App'x 977 (Chaney v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related