Chaney v. Mobile County, Alabama
This text of Chaney v. Mobile County, Alabama (Chaney v. Mobile County, Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
SHEKEBRA CHANEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-220-CG-M ) MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA, ) ) Defendant. )
ORDER DISMISSING FICTITIOUS PARTIES
The fictitious parties set out in Plaintiff’s Complaint are hereby STRICKEN because fictitious party pleading is not generally recognized under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See, e.g., Fed.R.Civ.P. 10(a); 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); Rommell v. Automobile Racing Club of America, Inc., 964 F.2d 1090, 1098 n. 14 (11th Cir. 1992); Weeks v. Benton, 649 F.Supp. 1297, 1298 (S.D.Ala. 1986).1 DONE and ORDERED this 7th day of June, 2021.
/s/ Callie V. S. Granade SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs amendment of the pleadings should the plaintiff discover additional parties against whom she wishes to assert claims. Plaintiff is further advised that the Court allows a reasonable period of time to add parties and amend the pleadings once the discovery process begins.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chaney v. Mobile County, Alabama, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaney-v-mobile-county-alabama-alsd-2021.