Chaneli Marquez v. Roberto Bordon Oran
This text of Chaneli Marquez v. Roberto Bordon Oran (Chaneli Marquez v. Roberto Bordon Oran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 11, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-2255 Lower Tribunal No. 18-22774-FC-04 ________________
Chaneli Marquez, Petitioner,
vs.
Roberto Bordon Oran, Respondent.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Prohibition.
Chaneli Marquez, in proper person.
No appearance, for respondent.
Before SCALES, C.J., and MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Finding that petitioner has adequately alleged a basis for disqualifying
the presiding judge, we grant the writ of prohibition. In doing so, we note that
“it does not matter whether the substance of the allegations are true.”
Jimenez v. Ratine, 954 So. 2d 706, 708 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); see also Bundy
v. Rudd, 366 So. 2d 440, 442 (Fla. 1978) (“Once a basis for disqualification
has been established, prohibition is both an appropriate and necessary
remedy.”). Confident that the trial court will promptly enter an order
consistent with this decision, we withhold issuance of the writ.
Petition granted; writ withheld.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chaneli Marquez v. Roberto Bordon Oran, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaneli-marquez-v-roberto-bordon-oran-fladistctapp-2026.