Chandramohan Gupta v. City of Bedford
This text of Chandramohan Gupta v. City of Bedford (Chandramohan Gupta v. City of Bedford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00039-CV ___________________________
CHANDRAMOHAN GUPTA, Appellant
V.
CITY OF BEDFORD, Appellee
On Appeal from the 67th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 067-322868-21
Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On April 9, 2021, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the
appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss
the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the
court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the
brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.
Per Curiam
Delivered: May 13, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chandramohan Gupta v. City of Bedford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandramohan-gupta-v-city-of-bedford-texapp-2021.