Chandler v. Unknown Howell

19 F. App'x 473
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 1, 2001
DocketNo. 01-1118
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 F. App'x 473 (Chandler v. Unknown Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chandler v. Unknown Howell, 19 F. App'x 473 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronald D. Chandler appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. After de novo review of the record, see Springdale Educ. Ass’n v. Springdale Sch. Dist., 133 F.3d 649, 651 (8th Cir.1998), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chandler v. Howell
535 U.S. 936 (Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 F. App'x 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-unknown-howell-ca8-2001.