Chandler v. Tanner
This text of 20 Tex. 1 (Chandler v. Tanner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant suggests delay, and asks damages. There is no service of process on one of the joint makers of the note, and judgment by default is taken against all of them. Upon [2]*2the authority of Saffold and others v. Navarro (15 Tex. R. 76) defendant may now dismiss as to Hamilton, who was not served, and the judgment will be reformed and rendered against those served with process.
Ordered accordingly,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Tex. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-tanner-tex-1857.