Chandler v. Tanner

Texas Supreme Court

Chandler v. Tanner

20 Tex. 1

Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1857·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Roberts, J.

Defendant suggests delay, and asks damages. There is no service of process on one of the joint makers of the note, and judgment by default is taken against all of them. Upon [2] the authority of Saffold and others v. Navarro (15 Tex. R. 76) defendant may now dismiss as to Hamilton, who was not served, and the judgment will be reformed and rendered against those served with process.

Ordered accordingly,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts, J.

Defendant suggests delay, and asks damages. There is no service of process on one of the joint makers of the note, and judgment by default is taken against all of them. Upon [2] the authority of Saffold and others v. Navarro (15 Tex. R. 76) defendant may now dismiss as to Hamilton, who was not served, and the judgment will be reformed and rendered against those served with process.

Ordered accordingly,

Chandler v. Tanner, 20 Tex. 1 (Tex. 1857).

Pincite

20 Tex. 1 (Chandler v. Tanner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related