Chandler v. State
230 S.W.2d 526, 155 Tex. Crim. 41, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1736
Opinion
It now appears that by special requested charge, the trial court did, in.fact, instruct’ the jury upon the law of aggravated assault and intent to kill.
It was upon the failure to instruct upon these defenses that we ordered a reversal, of the case.
Being in error in the conclusion reached,, the state’s motion for rehearing is granted, • the former opinion granting appellant’s-1 motion for rehearing is withdrawn, and appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.’
Opinion approved by the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chandler v. State, 230 S.W.2d 526, 155 Tex. Crim. 41, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1736 (Tex. 1950).
230 S.W.2d 526 (Chandler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gordon v. State
651 S.W.2d 793 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Thompson v. State
521 S.W.2d 621 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Chandler v. State
229 S.W.2d 71 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)