Chandler v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Chandler v. State

576 S.W.3d 336

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 2019·No. Nos. ED 106572/ED 106573·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In these consolidated appeals, Kevin Chandler appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his two Mo. R. Crim. P. 24.035 motions after an evidentiary hearing on both motions. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In these consolidated appeals, Kevin Chandler appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his two Mo. R. Crim. P. 24.035 motions after an evidentiary hearing on both motions. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

Chandler v. State, 576 S.W.3d 336 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

576 S.W.3d 336 (Chandler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.