Chandler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chandler v. State

900 So. 2d 779, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6631, 2005 WL 1047264

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chandler v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 843 So. 2d 1046 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 2005·No. No. 1D03-5384·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from judgment and sentence imposed for trafficking in cocaine, appellant claims, inter alia, that the trial court reversibly erred by allowing the prosecutor to peremptorily backstrike a juror after swearing of the jury panel and after all of the evidence was heard. We agree. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.310. We therefore reverse and remand for a new trial and find it unnecessary to address appellant’s remaining claims.

REVERSED; REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.

WOLF, C.J., DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from judgment and sentence imposed for trafficking in cocaine, appellant claims, inter alia, that the trial court reversibly erred by allowing the prosecutor to peremptorily backstrike a juror after swearing of the jury panel and after all of the evidence was heard. We agree. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.310. We therefore reverse and remand for a new trial and find it unnecessary to address appellant’s remaining claims.

REVERSED; REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.

WOLF, C.J., DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Chandler v. State, 900 So. 2d 779, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6631, 2005 WL 1047264 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

900 So. 2d 779 (Chandler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.