Chandler v. State
543 So. 2d 428, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2765, 1989 WL 51223
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 18, 1989
DocketNo. 88-2009
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 543 So. 2d 428 (Chandler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chandler v. State, 543 So. 2d 428, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2765, 1989 WL 51223 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
This is an appeal from a conviction in a drug case. Appellant’s attorney filed an Anders1 brief and appellant then filed a pro se brief. Neither brief brings up anything to warrant reversal but the pro se brief does raise a competency of counsel issue which must first be directed to the trial judge under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gordon v. Gordon
543 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
543 So. 2d 428, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2765, 1989 WL 51223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.