Chandler v. State

543 So. 2d 428, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2765, 1989 WL 51223
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 1989·No. No. 88-2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction in a drug case. Appellant’s attorney filed an Anders1 brief and appellant then filed a pro se brief. Neither brief brings up anything to warrant reversal but the pro se brief does raise a competency of counsel issue which must first be directed to the trial judge under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

AFFIRMED.

COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chandler v. State, 543 So. 2d 428, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2765, 1989 WL 51223 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

543 So. 2d 428 (Chandler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gordon v. Gordon
543 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)