Chandler v. State
This text of 503 So. 2d 443 (Chandler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals the judgment and sentence resulting from his plea of nolo con-tendere to possession of a controlled substance in excess of twenty grams.
After a review of the record and the law, we find no error in the judgment and sentence. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
However, we do find error in the court’s assessment of $220.00 costs against appellant pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985), without prior determination of appellant’s ability to pay. See Blanton v. State, 501 So.2d 181 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). We, therefore, strike the assessment of costs, but otherwise affirm the judgment and sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
503 So. 2d 443, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 710, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.