Chandler v. Rushing

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Chandler v. Rushing

251 So. 2d 423, 1971 La. App. LEXIS 5915

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 30, 1971

DocketNo. 8387

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 251 So. 2d 423 (Chandler v. Rushing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chandler v. Rushing, 251 So. 2d 423, 1971 La. App. LEXIS 5915 (La. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

TUCKER, Judge.

Since there is one of the six estates to which this servitude is owed involved in our Docket No. 8387, one-sixth (i/¿) of the total damages of $500.00 awarded here are attributable to the defendant in this suit.

For the reasons assigned in the suit entitled Smith et al. v. Chandler et ux, No. 8386 on the docket of this court, 251 So.2d 417, the judgment of the trial court is amended by increasing the indemnification award for the damages caused by the creation of the servitude from Thirty-Two and 33/100 ($32.33) Dollars to Eighty-Three and 33/100 ($83.33) Dollars, and in all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant, Mrs. Lurline W. Rushing, will post the costs of this appeal.

Affirmed as amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI