Chandler v. Roberts
This text of 573 F. App'x 286 (Chandler v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William L. Chandler appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012), and he has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Chandler’s motion to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s orders. Chandler v. Roberts, No. 1:13-cv-01115-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2013; Dec. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
573 F. App'x 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-roberts-ca4-2014.