Chandler v. Netherland

Fourth Circuit

Chandler v. Netherland

41 F. App'x 662

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2002·No. No. 02-6220·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Linwood Earl Chandler, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and agree that Chandler’s complaint fails to state a claim. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Chandler v. Netherland, No. CA-01-1911 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2002). We also deny Chandler’s [663] motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Linwood Earl Chandler, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and agree that Chandler’s complaint fails to state a claim. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Chandler v. Netherland, No. CA-01-1911 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2002). We also deny Chandler’s [663] motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Chandler v. Netherland, 41 F. App'x 662 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

41 F. App'x 662 (Chandler v. Netherland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related