Chandler v. Netherland
This text of Chandler v. Netherland (Chandler v. Netherland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6620
LINWOOD EARL CHANDLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
A. D. NETHERLAND, Acting Captain; W. M. PENN, Lieutenant; DAVID BARNES, Doctor; L. COLLINS, Inmate Adjustment Hearing Officer; ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-1911)
Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linwood Earl Chandler, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Linwood Earl Chandler, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 2001).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and
agree that Chandler’s complaint fails to state a claim.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. Chandler v. Netherland, No. CA-01-1911 (E.D. Va. Mar. 12,
2002). We also deny Chandler’s motion for sanctions. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chandler v. Netherland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-netherland-ca4-2002.