Chandler v. Nance

43 P.2d 1119, 181 Wash. 710, 1935 Wash. LEXIS 895
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedApril 23, 1935
DocketNo. 25257. Department Two.
StatusPublished

This text of 43 P.2d 1119 (Chandler v. Nance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chandler v. Nance, 43 P.2d 1119, 181 Wash. 710, 1935 Wash. LEXIS 895 (Wash. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was brought by the receiver of the Diamond Motor Parts Company, a corporation, against Lee J. Nance *711 to collect $550 and interest on account of an assessment against him as the owner of 550 shares of stock of the corporation upon its becoming insolvent, according to an order of assessment made in the United States district court for the district of Minnesota, September 30, 1931.

Upon a trial without a jury, findings and conclusions were made and filed upon which the superior court entered judgment dismissing the action. The plaintiff has appealed.

In all essential particulars going to the question of the right to recover, the case of Chandler v. Gallemore, ante p. 345, 43 P. (2d) 968, is controlling; therefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to the superior court to enter a judgment for appellant and against respondent in the sum of $550 and interest, as demanded in the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chandler v. Gallemore
43 P.2d 968 (Washington Supreme Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 P.2d 1119, 181 Wash. 710, 1935 Wash. LEXIS 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-nance-wash-1935.