Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Chandler v. Motivepower, Inc.

Chandler v. Motivepower, Inc.

239 So. 3d 1268
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 2018
DocketCase No. 2D17–1608
StatusPublished

This text of 239 So. 3d 1268 (Chandler v. Motivepower, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chandler v. Motivepower, Inc., 239 So. 3d 1268 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's order granting summary judgment without further comment. However, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the portion of the appeal challenging the trial court's reservation of jurisdiction *1269on attorney fees. See, e.g., Card v. Card, 122 So.3d 436, 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (dismissing the portion of the appeal challenging attorney fees because not only was the order ambiguous as to entitlement but it also failed to set an amount of fees thereby rendering that portion of the final judgment nonfinal and nonappealable).

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

KELLY, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Card v. Card
122 So. 3d 436 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 So. 3d 1268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-motivepower-inc-fladistctapp-2018.