Chandler v. Marlatt

Supreme Court

Chandler v. Marlatt

294 U.S. 696, 55 S. Ct. 516

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 18, 1935

DocketNo. 675

StatusPublished

This text of 294 U.S. 696 (Chandler v. Marlatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chandler v. Marlatt, 294 U.S. 696, 55 S. Ct. 516 (1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Ohio.

Per Curiam:

The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed upon the ground that it does not appear that the decision of a federal question was necessary to the determination of the cause or was actually determined. Lynch v. New York ex rel. Pierson, 293 U. S. 52; Wetzel v. Fulton, 293 U. S. 531; Kagarise v. Railroad Commission, 293 U. S. 527.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Ohio.

Per Curiam:

The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed upon the ground that it does not appear that the decision of a federal question was necessary to the determination of the cause or was actually determined. Lynch v. New York ex rel. Pierson, 293 U. S. 52; Wetzel v. Fulton, 293 U. S. 531; Kagarise v. Railroad Commission, 293 U. S. 527.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 U.S. 696, 55 S. Ct. 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-marlatt-scotus-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack