Chandler v. Knox

New York Supreme Court

Chandler v. Knox

34 N.Y.S. 1136, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 867

DecidedJuly 26, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 34 N.Y.S. 1136 (Chandler v. Knox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chandler v. Knox, 34 N.Y.S. 1136, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 867 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

DYICMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff entered upon the verdict of a jury after a trial at the circuit. The action was for malicious prosecution. As the testimony was substantially uncontradicted, or at least such that but one conclusion could be fairly reached upon the question, the trial judge determined that there was not prohable cause for the prosecution, and left the question of damages to the jury. There was no error committed upon the trial, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DYICMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff entered upon the verdict of a jury after a trial at the circuit. The action was for malicious prosecution. As the testimony was substantially uncontradicted, or at least such that but one conclusion could be fairly reached upon the question, the trial judge determined that there was not prohable cause for the prosecution, and left the question of damages to the jury. There was no error committed upon the trial, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 N.Y.S. 1136, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-knox-nysupct-1895.