Chandler v. Keese

127 S.E. 655, 160 Ga. 309, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 145
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 18, 1925·No. No. 4633·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. “A petition to a court of equity to cancel a deed as a cloud upon the title of the grantor, on the basis that it was void as representing a sale by a wife of her separate estate to her husband for a valuable consideration, without an order of the superior court of her domicile, when there was no offer to return the consideration recited and acknowledged in the deed to have been received, is demurrable.” Echols v. Green, 140 Ga. 678 (5) (79 S. E. 557), and cases cited; Williams v. Fouché, 157 Ga. 227 (121 S. E. 217).

2. Applying the principle ruled above to the facts of this case, the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Bussell, O. J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chandler v. Keese, 127 S.E. 655, 160 Ga. 309, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 145 (Ga. 1925).

127 S.E. 655 (Chandler v. Keese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deen v. Baxley State Bank
15 S.E.2d 194 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Franklin v. Cruce
200 S.E. 135 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)