Chandler v. Hoag
This text of 9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613 (Chandler v. Hoag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the 27th January, 1872, the defendant became a trustee of the Star Publishing Company, a manufacturing corporation organized under the general law. On the 20th of August, 1872, he sent in a written resignation, and ceased thereafter to act as trustee. The resignation was not acted on, or entered upon the minutes of the company, until November following. Held, that his trusteeship lasted from January 27th to August 20th, 1872, and not longer.
When defendant took the office of trustee, the annual report of ' the company, required by law to be published within twenty days after the first of January in each year, had not been published. The omission to publish it centinned during the trusteeship. A debt was contracted by the company to the plaintiffs assignor ; it passed into judgment, and, after the regular proceedings thereon, this action is brought to charge the defendant with personal liab'il- " ity therefor. It will be observed that three things concur here, as required by Shaler and Hall Quarry Co. v. Bliss,
[615]*615The fourth section of the general law in question, contemplates the resignation of a trustee. It does not say his resignation shall be accepted, nor does it require an entry in the minutes to make the resignation complete; and his right to resign does not seem to be in any doubt.
Present—Barnard, P. J., Tappen and Talcott, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event.
27 N. Y., 297.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-hoag-nysupct-1874.