Chandler v. Gordon
3 N.J.L. 658
Opinion
— We do not conceive it requisite to produce the evidence of the authority of the justice in the state of New-York, to act as such; but we [*] think that some satisfactory evidence ought to have been given that the magistrate before whom the proceedings were had in the State of New-York, was acting at the time in that capacity, and that the transcript of his proceedings were certified under his hand. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chandler v. Gordon, 3 N.J.L. 658 (N.J. 1810).
3 N.J.L. 658 (Chandler v. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.