Chandler v. Faulkner

5 Ala. 567
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1843·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ORMOND, J.

The case of Lockhart v. McElroy, [4 Ala. Rep. 572,] is in point, to show that this bill cannot be sustained. There is no allegation of facts to authorize the interposition of a court of chancery, but it is in effect merely an application to have satisfaction entered on the judgment of the defendant in error, so far as' it is discharged by the payment of the judgment rendered against the plaintiff in error, as garnishee. This, the court out of which the execution issued, can direct to be done, on motion, and it cannot therefore be tolerated, that resort should be had to a [568] court of chancery, -when the court of law, can afibrcfequally as efficient relief, and in a mode much more prompt, expeditious and cheap. The decree of the chancellor, must therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chandler v. Faulkner, 5 Ala. 567 (Ala. 1843).

5 Ala. 567 (Chandler v. Faulkner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dickinson v. Fletcher
182 P.2d 371 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1947)
Calhoun v. Whittle
56 Ala. 138 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1876)
Brown v. Cockerell
33 Ala. 38 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
Moore v. Lesueur
33 Ala. 237 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
Skipper v. Foster
29 Ala. 330 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1856)
Bruce v. Barnes
20 Ala. 219 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1852)
Faulkner v. Chandler
11 Ala. 725 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1847)