Chandler v. Dunn
50 Cal. 15, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 73
Opinion
The plaintiff’s title is derived through a sale for delinquent taxes for the fiscal year 1868-9—the defendant’s through a sale for taxes for the year 1865-6. The facts are substantially the same as in the case of Anderson v. Rider (46 Cal. 138), in which we held that “the title acquired under a tax sale for taxes of a subsequent year must prevail over a title founded on a sale for the taxes of a previous year.” (Dougherty v. Henarie, 47 Cal. 10.)
Judgment reversed. Bemittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chandler v. Dunn, 50 Cal. 15, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 73 (Cal. 1875).
50 Cal. 15 (Chandler v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Billings v. Delgado
125 P.2d 95 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)
Woodill & Hulse Electric Co. v. Young
182 P. 422 (California Supreme Court, 1919)
Blanchard v. Ladd
67 P. 131 (California Supreme Court, 1901)