Chandler v. City of Lawrence

128 Mass. 213, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 42
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 21, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 128 Mass. 213 (Chandler v. City of Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chandler v. City of Lawrence, 128 Mass. 213, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 42 (Mass. 1880).

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The ordinance by which the engineer’s office was created expressly reserved to the city council the power to remove him at pleasure. The repeal of that ordinance by the city council, and notice to him of such repeal, operated as a removal. Brackett v. Blake, 7 Met. 835, 339. Knowles v. Boston, 12 Gray, 339.

By the city charter of Lawrence all powers vested in the mayor and aldermen and common council jointly are “ to be exercised by concurrent vote, each board to have a negative upon the other; ” the mayor presides in the board of aldermen, but his separate approval of an ordinance is not required, nor has he any veto power, as under the amended city charter of Boston. Sts. 1853, c. 70, §§ 6-8; 1854, o. 448, §§ 35, 47.

The passage of the repealing ordinance to be ordained by each branch of the city council is shown, as to the board of mayor and aldermen, by the certificate of the mayor, being the chairman of that board, and, as to the common council, by the certificate of its president. The departure from the provision of the joint rules and orders, which directs that every ordinance shall be passed first in the common council, does not affect its validity. Bennett v. New Bedford, 110 Mass. 433. Holt v. City Council of Somerville, 127 Mass. 408. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cullen v. Mayor of Newton
32 N.E.2d 201 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Williams v. City of New Bedford
21 N.E.2d 265 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Young v. Town of Westport
20 N.E.2d 404 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Coleman v. Louison
5 N.E.2d 46 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1936)
Bailen v. Board of Assessors of Chelsea
135 N.E. 877 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
Commonwealth v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
92 N.E. 766 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Wheelock v. City of Lowell
81 N.E. 977 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Heath v. Salt Lake City
52 P. 602 (Utah Supreme Court, 1898)
Murphy v. Webster
131 Mass. 482 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 Mass. 213, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-city-of-lawrence-mass-1880.