Home/New York Supreme Court/Chandler v. Bicknell

Chandler v. Bicknell

5 Cow. 30
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1825·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Curia.

We do not see why this case should not stand on the same footing, as if the cause had gone off at the circuit, for want of sufficient testimony on the part of the plaintiff, without a jury being sworn. We might refuse to nonsuit the plaintiff, or excuse from stipulating; hut not from costs. There must be the usual rule nisi.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chandler v. Bicknell, 5 Cow. 30 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).

5 Cow. 30 (Chandler v. Bicknell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Linda Plemons, A/K/A Linda Plemons Buechler v. Douglas Q. Gale Advantage 99 Td, a Delaware Business Trust, by and Through Its Trustee, and U.S. Public Finance, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, National Tax Lien Association, Amicus Supporting Linda Plemons, A/K/A Linda Plemons Buechler v. Douglas Q. Gale Advantage 99 Td, a Delaware Business Trust, by and Through Its Trustee, and U.S. Public Finance, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, National Tax Lien Association, Amicus Supporting
396 F.3d 569 (Fourth Circuit, 2005)
State Ex Rel. Polk v. Johnson
177 N.W.2d 122 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1970)
Planer v. Smith
40 Wis. 31 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1876)