Chandler v. Batchelder

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Chandler v. Batchelder

61 N.H. 370

DecidedDecember 5, 1881

StatusPublished

This text of 61 N.H. 370 (Chandler v. Batchelder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chandler v. Batchelder, 61 N.H. 370 (N.H. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Dob, C. J.

Whether Mrs. Batchelder has an estate or a power, the rights of all interested parties make a proper case for the exercise of the administrator’s authority to convey to the hospital (after settling his account in the probate court), when a sufficient bond is given, running to him and his official successors, or to the judge of probate, for the security of all who may need it. Healey v. Top-pan, 45 N. H. 243. The form of the decree, conveyance, and security will be determined at the trial term.

Case discharged.

Smith and Clark, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dob, C. J.

Whether Mrs. Batchelder has an estate or a power, the rights of all interested parties make a proper case for the exercise of the administrator’s authority to convey to the hospital (after settling his account in the probate court), when a sufficient bond is given, running to him and his official successors, or to the judge of probate, for the security of all who may need it. Healey v. Top-pan, 45 N. H. 243. The form of the decree, conveyance, and security will be determined at the trial term.

Case discharged.

Smith and Clark, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 N.H. 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-batchelder-nh-1881.