Chandler v. Barker

2 Del. 316
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided July 5, 1837·Published

Opinion

Cause continued because the plaintiff was imprisoned in solitary confinement, and his counsel not permitted to see him.

Motion for a continuance. The plaintiff had been convicted of blasphemy and sentenced; at the present term, to twenty days solitary confinement, which were not yet out. When this cause was called for trial, Macbeth, of counsel for plaintiff, asked to be permitted to see his client, which the court refused; and he then moved for a continuance on this ground, which the court granted, though a trial was pressed by the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chandler v. Barker, 2 Del. 316 (Del. Ct. App. 1837).

2 Del. 316 (Chandler v. Barker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.