Chandler v. Atlantic Scrap & Processing
749 S.E.2d 278, 367 N.C. 160, 2013 WL 5973917, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1159
Opinions
For the reasons stated in Mehaffey v. Burger King,_N.C._, _ S.E.2d __ (2013) (No. 24PA12), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed as to the matter on appeal to this Court, and this case is remanded to that court for further remand to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings not inconsistent with Mehaffey.
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chandler v. Atlantic Scrap & Processing, 749 S.E.2d 278, 367 N.C. 160, 2013 WL 5973917, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1159 (N.C. 2013).
749 S.E.2d 278 (Chandler v. Atlantic Scrap & Processing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chandler v. Atl. Scrap & Processing, Emp'r, & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
780 S.E.2d 575 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2015)
Burroughs v. Laser Recharge of Carolinas, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014