Chandler v. Atlantic Scrap & Processing

749 S.E.2d 278, 367 N.C. 160, 2013 WL 5973917, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1159
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 8, 2013·No. 35PA12·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in Mehaffey v. Burger King,_N.C._, _ S.E.2d __ (2013) (No. 24PA12), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed as to the matter on appeal to this Court, and this case is remanded to that court for further remand to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings not inconsistent with Mehaffey.

[161] Justice BEASLEY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chandler v. Atlantic Scrap & Processing, 749 S.E.2d 278, 367 N.C. 160, 2013 WL 5973917, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1159 (N.C. 2013).

749 S.E.2d 278 (Chandler v. Atlantic Scrap & Processing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chandler v. Atl. Scrap & Processing, Emp'r, & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
780 S.E.2d 575 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2015)
Burroughs v. Laser Recharge of Carolinas, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014